Vol. 4 (2022): january-december: continuous publication
Original article

Taxation and accounting expertise of MYPES in the money laundering process 2018-2019

Ronald Prado-Ramos
San Cristóbal of Huamanga University

Published 2022-02-02

Keywords

  • Taxation,
  • micro and small business,
  • accounting expertise,
  • asset endorsement

How to Cite

Prado-Ramos, R. (2022). Taxation and accounting expertise of MYPES in the money laundering process 2018-2019. Puriq, 4, e237. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.4.1.237

Métricas alternativas

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate the influence of taxation on the accounting expertise of micro and small entrepreneurs in a process of money laundering. Method: The study was quantitative, descriptive and exploratory; the non-experimental transectional study. A field inspection was carried out, with observations of the micro and small entities using surveys during the 2018-2019 period. Results: Taxation directly influences the accounting expertise practiced by MYPES since the expert practice is determined from an accounting purely for tax purposes, with the formulation of external professionals that contains inconsistencies and inaccuracies with the transactions carried out by their organization. Conclusions: The Data obtained as a result of the study have made it possible to establish that micro and small companies are at the mercy of a Taxation that conditions their accounting and therefore the accounting expertise practiced, weakening it, to be dismissed by the judge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abad Valdivia, M. F. y Rodríguez Morales, E. M. (2019). El Peritaje contable en los procesos judiciales y su incidencia en la. Lima. https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12692/46001/Abad_VMF-Rodr%C3%ADguez_MEM-SD.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  2. Alvarado, E. M. (2018). Enfoques epistemológicos de la prueba pericial en los procesos judiciales por lavado de activos en la sala penal nacional. Tacna. http://repositorio.upt.edu.pe/bitstream/UPT/1411/1/Cordova-Alvarado-Eduar.pdf
  3. Cabello Reiniso, V. (2017). Peritaje Financiero vinculada al delito de lavado de activos en la sala penal nacional, 2013-2016 (Tesis para Optar Grado de Maestro en Gestión Pública). https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12692/5415/Cabello_RVR.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  4. Ferullo, C. F., Grecchi, A. M. y Vitta, J. M. (2006). Impuesto sobre los ingresos brutos - asimetrías que deben eliminarse. FCEyE 2006 - Actas Jornadas Anuales. http://hdl.handle.net/2133/8779
  5. Chávez, L. A. (2018). NIIF y Tributación. Revista de Administración Tributaria CIAT, 1-5. Obtenido de https://www.ciat.org/Biblioteca/Revista/Revista_43/español/2018_RA_43_chavez.pdf
  6. Lobo, E. (17 de 10 de 2017). Algunas cuestiones sobre la prueba pericial contable en el proceso penal peruano. (U. S. Porres, Editor) https://derecho.usmp.edu.pe/sapere/ediciones/edicion_11/concursos/2014/3ER_PUESTO.pdf
  7. Ministerio de Justicia (2004). Nuevo Código Procesal Penal. Decreto Legislativo N.º 957. Perú: El Diario el Peruano (29 de julio de 2004).
  8. Morales, A. A. (2009). Enfoque doctrinario y factual del peritaje judicial contable en el Perú (2004-2008). Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. http://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12672/4566/Arroyo_ma.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  9. Ramon, J. G. (2014). La Prueba Pericial. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Contables Quipukamayoc, 22, 139. https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/quipu/article/view/11056/9935